Rhetorical Analysis
Every ad, every speech, every opinion article is trying to do something to you — convince you, move you, make you buy, make you vote. Rhetorical analysis is the skill of stepping back and asking: what is this text trying to make me feel or believe, and how?
Aristotle's three appeals
Over 2,000 years ago, Aristotle named three core ways speakers persuade:\n\n- **Ethos** — credibility. "Trust me because I'm an expert / a doctor / a witness."\n- **Pathos** — emotion. "Picture the suffering child. Now act."\n- **Logos** — logic. "Here are the numbers. Here is the evidence."\n\nMost real persuasion blends all three. A good rhetorical analysis names which appeals are being used, where, and whether they work honestly.
A charity ad shows a crying child and asks "can you look away?" This primarily uses:
Tone, diction, and rhetorical moves
Beyond the big three, writers use tons of smaller moves:\n\n- **Repetition** — "I have a dream..."\n- **Parallel structure** — "We will fight on the beaches, we will fight on the landing grounds..."\n- **Loaded language** — "death tax" vs. "estate tax" (same policy, different feelings)\n- **Rhetorical questions** — "Is this really the country we want to be?"\n\nYou don't have to name every device. You do have to notice that the writer is choosing words for effect, not just information.
Ad breakdown
Find any advertisement — print, TV, YouTube, social media. Write one paragraph identifying: (1) what the ad wants you to do, (2) one ethos appeal, (3) one pathos appeal, (4) one logos appeal (or note if it's missing), and (5) one rhetorical move (repetition, loaded words, etc.). Decide: is the ad's persuasion honest or misleading?
What does "evaluating argument and specific claims" (CCSS RI.8.8) ask a reader to do?
Sniffing out weak or dishonest arguments
Good rhetorical analysis catches when a writer:\n\n- Cites no sources\n- Uses emotional language to hide weak logic\n- Attacks the person instead of the argument (ad hominem)\n- Offers a false choice ("you're either with us or against us")\n- Appeals to false authority ("scientists say" — which scientists?)\n\nThis is your BS detector. In an age of viral content, it may be the most important reading skill you can develop.
Counter-analysis
Take a political opinion article (from any source — pick one you agree with on purpose, to practice being fair). Write 2 paragraphs: paragraph 1 names the strongest argument the writer makes and why it works. Paragraph 2 names the weakest move — a gap in evidence, a loaded word, an emotional appeal that covers for thin logic. Being able to critique writers you agree with is the mark of a mature reader.
The phrase "point of view and purpose" (CCSS RI.8.6) matters because:
The skill you build here — seeing the moves a writer is making while still engaging with the content — will serve you in college, in your career, in voting, and in every conversation you have about something that matters. Reading closely is a kind of self-defense.
Want to keep learning?
Sign up for free to access the full curriculum — all subjects, all ages.
Start Learning Free